a joyous celebration of kittenhood

laurakvstheworld:

orangemuses:

Anapneo Wishes Matt Goodnight: The difference between Katy Perry and Adele

merlinthegrey:

orangemuses:

Katy Perry has to have an amazing acrobatic act with pyrotechnics and blue hair and daft punk reminiscent outfits in order to put on a show.

Adele needs a black dress and her voice.

Ugh what a stupid comparison. It’s hardly even worth explaining why.

…

I’d say it’s worth a lot more than ‘something’. I mean, music is the reason these women are famous. And Adele’s voice is simply the best there is. I enjoy both PERFORMERS, but Adele is through and through a MUSICIAN. And I honestly am wholly entertained and mesmerized just by her voice. No flashiness necessary. So to me, she DOES put on a show, and it’s an excellent one. I mean, JOHN LENNON ave her a standing ovation at the Grammys. What the hell else do you want?

mina john lennon is very much dead

yeah and that says a lot about adeles performance. 

you literally couldnt want more than a dead singer giving you a standing ovation 

it was so great michael jackson cried

Reblogged 3 months ago from laurakvstheworld (Originally from orangemuses)
49 notes
Source: orangemuses
  1. keepyrfingerscrossed reblogged this from merlinthegrey and added:
    Reblogging for Merlin’s comment. If you’re paying to go to a show, you want to see a show.
  2. kanyewestisaprettycoolguy reblogged this from mrfrodo
  3. mrfrodo reblogged this from merlinthegrey and added:
    are we to say that a performance with set pieces, costumes and props is to be condemned as non-enhancing of ones evening...
  4. orangemuses reblogged this from mattcull and added:
    … Okay, let me try this again. I’d say...a lot more than ‘something’. I mean, music...
  5. be-the-beauty-to-my-beast reblogged this from marcoayedoewelive and added:
    When you take into account the fact that Adele is, in fact, actually singing as opposed to Katy Perry who, well, chants…...
  6. jellybeing reblogged this from laurakvstheworld and added:
    yeah and that says a lot about adeles performance. you literally couldnt want more than a dead singer giving you a...
  7. marcoayedoewelive reblogged this from laurakvstheworld and added:
    fucking stupid, every artist has...special way of differing themselves from their...
  8. s-wowwtittybang reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    And all these stage antics take away from the fact Katy Perry sounds horrid live.
  9. laurakvstheworld reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    mina john lennon is very much dead
  10. quazza reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    John Lennon what he’s dead broski doski
  11. mattcull reblogged this from merlinthegrey and added:
    Spose it’s worth mentioning the fact that Katy Perry, for all her showcraft, is a raging homophobe? And in Adele’s...
  12. merlinthegrey reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    Ugh what a stupid comparison. It’s hardly even worth explaining why. Personally though,
  13. perksofbeingawankflower reblogged this from badafro
  14. psychedelightful reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    is classy. Theyʻre both still awesome.
  15. badcgijosh said: There are a ton of differences because the two artists are pretty incommensurable beyond their identified gender and their instrument of choice
  16. thejesusofequestria reblogged this from japaneseanimes
  17. japaneseanimes reblogged this from badafro
  18. badafro reblogged this from blogsaretough
  19. hored-and-borny reblogged this from blogsaretough
  20. apoetsprose reblogged this from orangemuses
  21. shirleytemples said: Yeah but still then Katy perry is good in her own way. It’s just not as much about her voice. Like yeah she’s more of a…showgirl but it’s great and cute and sweet and fun. Adele has the voice. Sorry I love Katy k bye
  22. blogsaretough reblogged this from orangemuses and added:
    i this is an unfair comparison. because they’re two entirely different forms of musical entertainment. katy perry isn’t...
  23. orangemuses posted this